A new proposal in Congress aims to substantially increase Social Security survivor benefits for widowed individuals and surviving divorced spouses. The plan arrives as roughly 5.8 million Americans rely on survivor benefits nationwide; nearly 4 million of them widowed and many struggle under rules that reduce payouts for younger survivors or those with disabilities.
Why Survivor Benefits Matter More Than Ever
Under current law, surviving spouses and former spouses can receive benefits only under strict conditions, with sharply reduced payments if they are under age 62. Many disabled widowed individuals and surviving divorced spouses fall into a coverage gap that leaves them receiving far less than the benefit they would otherwise be entitled to.
The Current Rules Leave Millions Behind
For surviving divorced spouses, eligibility generally begins at age 60; or age 50 for those with disabilities, and only if the marriage lasted at least 10 years. Those who lose a spouse earlier in life often face substantial financial hardship, especially if caring for children.
What the SWIFT Act Would Change
The Surviving Widow(er) Income Fair Treatment (SWIFT) Act, introduced this week by several Senate Democrats, seeks to overhaul these provisions. The bill would allow widowed spouses and surviving divorced spouses with disabilities to receive full survivor benefits at any age, eliminating the current early-benefit penalty.
Expanded Support for Caregivers
The proposal also broadens “child-in-care” benefits, offering additional financial support to survivors caring for minor or disabled children. Lawmakers backing the bill argue this would modernize a system built on outdated assumptions about caregiving and workforce participation.
The Senators Behind the Push
The legislation was introduced by:
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
All have positioned the bill as a fairness measure designed to strengthen the economic security of widowed Americans, particularly women who are disproportionately affected.
Democrats Pair It With Broader Social Security Boosts
The SWIFT Act comes alongside other Democratic proposals aimed at increasing benefits:
The Social Security Emergency Inflation Relief Act would provide a $200 monthly boost until July 2026.
The Boosting Benefits and COLAs for Seniors Act would overhaul how annual cost-of-living adjustments are calculated.
Together, the proposals signal a concerted push to increase federal retirement and survivor benefits during a period of rising prices and heightened financial strain.
What Lawmakers Are Saying
Gillibrand framed the bill as a long-overdue modernization of the program, arguing that outdated rules “mean too many seniors, especially widowed spouses, aren’t receiving the benefits they’ve earned.” Blumenthal added that the SWIFT Act “removes barriers” preventing survivors from receiving the full support they deserve.
The Looming Issue: Social Security’s Insolvency Clock
But the debate is unfolding against a sobering backdrop: Social Security’s primary trust fund is projected to run short within a decade.
According to the latest 2025 Trustees Report:
The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will pay full benefits only until 2033, after which it will cover just 77% of scheduled payments.
The combined OASDI projection (OASI + DI) would run short in 2034, paying about 81% of promised benefits.
The depletion timeline moved three quarters earlier than last year’s projection; a sign of accelerating strain.
Could New Benefit Expansions Speed Up Depletion?
Analysts warn that expanding survivor benefits; without corresponding revenue increases could worsen the trust fund’s outlook. The Trustees emphasize that both Social Security and Medicare face “significant financing issues” that require congressional action, regardless of proposed benefit enhancements.
Medicare Is Also Under Pressure
The Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund, which covers Medicare Part A, is projected to hit depletion in 2033, three years earlier than last year’s projection. At that point, it would pay about 89% of scheduled benefits.
Supporters Say the Moral Case Outweighs Fiscal Concerns
Backers of the SWIFT Act argue that widowed and disabled Americans shouldn’t bear the burden of Social Security’s financial shortfalls. They contend the program should be strengthened, not trimmed, and that Congress can address solvency through tax adjustments or broader reforms.
Opponents Say Congress Is Ignoring the Math
Critics counter that lawmakers continue proposing benefit expansions with no clear plan to stabilize the trust funds. They warn that without structural reform, younger workers; and even near-retirees; could face automatic benefit cuts within nine years.
Social Security Fairness Act Helped Government Workers But Resulted in Social Security Cuts for Everyone Else
Seniors are rightfully wary of the new proposals.
According to the latest Social Security Trustees’ report, the program’s trust funds are now projected to run dry by 2034; one year earlier than previously forecast.
The accelerated timeline is primarily due to the added cost of the Social Security Fairness Act, which boosted payouts for millions of retired public workers.
In a dramatic midnight vote on December 21st, 2024, the Senate passed the Social Security Fairness Act, a controversial measure to boost retirement benefits for public sector workers.
On Jan 5th, 2025, President Biden signed into law legislation extending additional benefits to government workers. The bill aimed to repeal two provisions, the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), which currently reduce Social Security payouts for public sector worker.
Critics had warned that the bill, which repeals provisions reducing payouts for pension recipients, could further destabilize Social Security’s already strained finances.
What Happens Next in Congress
The SWIFT Act has been formally introduced in the Senate and will now be referred to the relevant committee. Hearings, amendments, and potential negotiations would follow, though its path forward remains uncertain in a divided Congress.
A High-Stakes Debate for Millions of Americans
With nearly 6 million survivors depending on Social Security benefits; and insolvency deadlines inching closer, the outcome of this proposal could have wide-ranging implications for financial stability, caregiving, and retirement security.
A Major Expansion of Survivor Benefits Hits Congress
The SWIFT Act offers meaningful relief for widowed Americans and surviving divorced spouses, but it also raises tough questions about timing, fiscal sustainability, and Congress’s willingness to confront the larger challenges facing Social Security.
If lawmakers move forward with benefit expansions while the trust fund’s depletion date approaches, the pressure to pass long-delayed solvency reforms will only intensify.
Like Financial Freedom Countdown content? Be sure to follow us!
Elizabeth Warren Pushes $200 Monthly Social Security Boost as Seniors Say They’re ‘Falling Behind’
As inflation continues to strain fixed incomes, Senate Democrats have introduced a proposal to temporarily boost Social Security and veterans’ benefits by $200 per month. The plan; framed as an emergency measure, would run for six months starting in early 2026, giving retirees some extra room to manage escalating costs for groceries, medical care, utilities, and housing.
Elizabeth Warren Pushes $200 Monthly Social Security Boost as Seniors Say They’re ‘Falling Behind’
The 30% Rule is Dead: New Data Shows Buying a Home is ‘Mathematically Impossible’ in 47 Major Cities
The American Dream has hit a mathematical wall. For decades, the “30% rule” has been the standard of personal finance: never spend more than 30% of your gross income on housing. But a startling new report released proves that this advice is now obsolete for the vast majority of Americans. According to the latest data, 47 of the 50 largest U.S. metropolitan areas now require residents to spend significantly more than 30% of their income to afford a median-priced home. With mortgage rates hovering around 6.82% and home prices remaining stubborn, the gap between wages and real estate values has widened into a canyon. Here is a deep dive into the numbers, revealing the few remaining affordable havens and the coastal giants where homeownership has become a statistical impossibility.
The 30% Rule is Dead: New Data Shows Buying a Home is ‘Mathematically Impossible’ in 47 Major Cities
Think $32,000 Is Poverty? New Analysis Says Families Need $140,000 Just to Stay Afloat
Michael Green, portfolio manager and chief strategist at Simplify Asset Management, generated some controversy this week with his analysis trying to explain why the middle class is being squeezed. He warned that a long-ignored flaw at the heart of U.S. economic measurement has quietly broken the country.
Think $32,000 Is Poverty? New Analysis Says Families Need $140,000 Just to Stay Afloat
Did you find this article helpful? We’d love to hear your thoughts! Leave a comment with the box on the left-hand side of the screen and share your thoughts.
Also, do you want to stay up-to-date on our latest content?
1. Follow us by clicking the [+ Follow] button above,
2. Give the article a Thumbs Up on the top-left side of the screen.
3. And lastly, if you think this information would benefit your friends and family, don’t hesitate to share it with them!
John Dealbreuin came from a third world country to the US with only $1,000 not knowing anyone; guided by an immigrant dream. In 12 years, he achieved his retirement number.
He started Financial Freedom Countdown to help everyone think differently about their financial challenges and live their best lives. John resides in the San Francisco Bay Area enjoying nature trails and weight training.
Here are his recommended tools
Personal Capital: This is a free tool John uses to track his net worth on a regular basis and as a retirement planner. It also alerts him wrt hidden fees and has a budget tracker included.
Platforms like Yieldstreet provide investment options in art, legal, real estate, structured notes, venture capital, etc. They also have fixed-income portfolios spread across multiple asset classes with a single investment with low minimums of $10,000.
